Outside and inside form a dialectic of division, the obvious geometry of which blinds us as soon as we bring it into play in metaphorical domains.
- Gaston, Bachelard (1992. The Poetics of Space. P211)
“This side” and “beyond” are faint repetitions of the dialectics of inside and outside: everything takes form, even infinity.
- Gaston, Bachelard (1992. The Poetics of Space. P212)
- Gaston, Bachelard (1992. The Poetics of Space. P211)
“This side” and “beyond” are faint repetitions of the dialectics of inside and outside: everything takes form, even infinity.
- Gaston, Bachelard (1992. The Poetics of Space. P212)
I want to keep something in this piece. I won’t tell anyone what it is, and I was forgot what I did put in. It probably a piece of expensive jewellery; it probably souvenir; it might some cash; it might just some rubbish I threw.
Do you think it is the things inside are able to affect the value of it, unless you don’t know what in it can be an invaluable asset, it can be unworthiness.
But you can chose to break it, and see what in it, but you may have everything, you may have nothing. Is imagine better or the truth is better?
Is outside important or the inside important?
Is outside is valuable or the inside?
Is outside important or the inside important?
Is outside is valuable or the inside?
